Jump to: Models | Files | Wiki

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_003

Title
A single sentence description.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v003
Description This Test computes an energy vs. lattice constant curve for bcc Cu. The curve is computed for lattice constants ranging from 0.8*a_0 to 1.5*a_0, where a_0 represents the equilibrium lattice constant. The value for a_0 is obtained by querying the KIM database for the results of LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_bcc_Cu when paired against the Model being used.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Cu
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer Daniel S. Karls
Publication Year 2019
How to Cite

This Test is archived in OpenKIM [1-4].

[1] Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v003. OpenKIM; 2019.

[2] Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/64cb38c5

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
TE_864632638496_003
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_003
Citable Link https://openkim.org/cite/TE_864632638496_003
KIM Item TypeTest
DriverCohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003
Properties
Properties as defined in kimspec.edn. These properties are inhereted from the Test Driver.
KIM API Version2.0
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn. This Simulator Name is inhereted from the Test Driver.
LAMMPS
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
100.00% Python
Previous Version CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_002


Models

EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandTichyVitek_1987_Cu__MO_179025990738_005 view 3103
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandTichyVitek_1987v2_Cu__MO_762798677854_000 view 3295
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandVitek_1990_Cu__MO_642748370624_000 view 3199
EAM_Dynamo_AdamsFoilesWolfer_1989Universal6_Cu__MO_145873824897_000 view 2239
EAM_Dynamo_BonnyPasianotCastin_2009_FeCuNi__MO_469343973171_005 view 3487
EAM_Dynamo_BorovikovMendelevKing_2016_CuZr__MO_097471813275_000 view 4702
EAM_Dynamo_CaiYe_1996_AlCu__MO_942551040047_005 view 2687
EAM_Dynamo_Foiles_1985_Cu__MO_831121933939_000 view 2111
EAM_Dynamo_FoilesBaskesDaw_1986Universal3_Cu__MO_666348409573_004 view 2207
EAM_Dynamo_GolaPastewka_2018_CuAu__MO_426403318662_000 view 1676
EAM_Dynamo_HoytGarvinWebb_2003_PbCu__MO_119135752160_005 view 2303
EAM_Dynamo_LiuLiuBorucki_1999_AlCu__MO_020851069572_000 view 2079
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2008_Cu__MO_748636486270_005 view 3039
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKramerBecker_2008_Cu__MO_945691923444_005 view 3231
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKramerOtt_2009_CuZr__MO_600021860456_005 view 4510
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSordeletKramer_2007_CuZr__MO_120596890176_005 view 4223
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSunZhang_2019_CuZr__MO_609260676108_000 view 5287
EAM_Dynamo_MishinMehlPapaconstantopoulos_2001_Cu__MO_346334655118_005 view 3647
EAM_Dynamo_OnatDurukanoglu_2014_CuNi__MO_592013496703_005 view 3583
EAM_Dynamo_WilliamsMishinHamilton_2006_CuAg__MO_128703483589_005 view 4223
EAM_Dynamo_WuTrinkle_2009_CuAg__MO_270337113239_005 view 2815
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouJohnsonWadley_2004_Cu__MO_127245782811_005 view 2207
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouJohnsonWadley_2004NISTretabulation_CuAgAu__MO_318213562153_000 view 2687
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001_Cu__MO_380822813353_000 view 3423
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001_CuTa__MO_547744193826_000 view 2687
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001NISTretabulation_Cu__MO_759493141826_000 view 2559
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001NISTretabulation_CuTa__MO_950828638160_000 view 2559
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_001 view 2271
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_PaduraruKenoufiBailey_2007_CuZr__MO_987541074959_001 view 2175
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_001 view 2367
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_Cu__MO_396616545191_001 view 2335
LJ__MD_414112407348_003
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LJ_ElliottAkerson_2015_Universal__MO_959249795837_003 view 2367
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_000
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_000 view 2527
MEAM_LAMMPS_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__MO_390178379548_000 view 1579
MEAM_LAMMPS_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Cu__MO_227887284491_000 view 1990
MEAM_LAMMPS_JelinekGrohHorstemeyer_2012_AlSiMgCuFe__MO_262519520678_000 view 13804
MEAM_LAMMPS_JeongParkDo_2018_PdCu__MO_353393547686_000 view 2243
MEAM_LAMMPS_KangSaLee_2009_ZrAgCu__MO_813575892799_000 view 1895
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtCu__MO_070797404269_000 view 1801
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeShim_2004_NiCu__MO_409065472403_000 view 3190
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeWirthShim_2005_FeCu__MO_063626065437_000 view 4580
MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_000 view 5907
MEAM_LAMMPS_Wagner_2007_Cu__MO_313717476091_000 view 1200
MEAM_LAMMPS_WangOhLee_2020_CuCo__MO_694335101831_000 view 3570
MEAM_LAMMPS_WangOhLee_2020_CuCo__MO_849011491644_000 view 3664
MEAM_LAMMPS_WangOhLee_2020_CuMo__MO_380272712420_000 view 4012
MEAM_LAMMPS_WangOhLee_2020_CuMo__MO_486450342170_000 view 3696
Morse_Shifted__MD_552566534109_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959HighCutoff_Cu__MO_151002396060_004 view 799
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959LowCutoff_Cu__MO_673777079812_004 view 767
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959MedCutoff_Cu__MO_173787283511_004 view 927
SNAP__MD_536750310735_000
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
SNAP_LiHuChen_2018_Cu__MO_529419924683_000 view 501
SNAP_ZuoChenLi_2019_Cu__MO_931672895580_000 view 689
SNAP_ZuoChenLi_2019quadratic_Cu__MO_265210066873_000 view 313
No Driver
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Mendelev_2019_CuZr__MO_945018740343_000 view 741
EAM_NN_Johnson_1988_Cu__MO_887933271505_002 view 1823
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_ApostolMishin_2011_AlCu__SM_667696763561_000 view 4255
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_PunDarlingKecskes_2015_CuTa__SM_399364650444_000 view 4255
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2015_CCu__SM_784926969362_000 view 2751
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2015_CuH__SM_404135993060_000 view 2975
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2016_AlCu__SM_566399258279_000 view 3423
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__SM_239791545509_000 view 2623
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Cu__SM_316120381362_000 view 2303
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_JelinekGrohHorstemeyer_2012_AlSiMgCuFe__SM_656517352485_000 view 8957
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000 view 1951





Download Dependency

This Test requires a Test Driver. Archives for the Test Driver CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003 appear below.


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.zip Zip Windows archive

Wiki

Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content